Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Should You Respond To A Rejection Letter

Di Pietro and public water








Di Pietro and Italy of Values \u200b\u200bin these days are launching a referendum to repeal, in fact, the Ronchi decree which provides for the mandatory for municipalities to privatize at least 30% of its water supply.
So far nothing shocking, indeed laudable action that is part the various referendum campaigns carried out by former PM, but views from many free content, but made only to grab the votes of quell'elettorato opinion disoriented by the lack of a serious left.
Even if "water" can be seen using IDV Election: the campaign for months is the water that is carried out by public water committees, which provide total control of the water network by municipalities, while Di Pietro, with "his" referendum would only reset the Ronchi Decree. Di Pietro
since it went into politics, according to the committee, has never lent an ear to the demands of citizens whose communities have donated water to the private-such Aprilia (in Illinois) where they saw within a year to increase its 68.25% of the bill - but is now a weapon of pen and paper to collect signatures splitting before the referendum.
Furthermore, if passed, the proposed text dall'IdV, municipalities retain the ability to assign up to 100% of their water to private. It would eliminate the only binding.
So in these months we will have several banquets on the same subject scattered throughout the Italian squares, first in Italy of Values, the other committees emerged over the years, the meet up grillini, Left Ecology Freedom with Nichi Vendola, The Federation of the Left, and confusion will be obvious to those who want to defend a vital commodity such as water and nothing more.
Three prospects following the collection of signatures from the two fronts:
1. Neither referendum collect the necessary signatures (Ronchi Decree remains in force and mandatory for municipalities to privatize one third of the water);
2. Only one collects the required signatures (we have already described the differences) so we will vote according to the system of referendum, which provides for the passing of a quorum (50% +1);
3. Both collect the necessary signatures, and being on the same subject, the Supreme Court asked to mediate between the two questions, in which case you will have to come to terms between the "Di Pietro and public water" and then hope for the overcoming of a quorum at the polls.
This use of the referendum and instrumental media, especially on a matter of vital importance as water, is causing not a few ill-feeling between those who have been following this battle and find themselves struggling with the few resources available and the ' incredible gap of visibility on TV and newspapers zero.
"Di Pietro has once again shown that it is the wrong man in the wrong place, but who knows how to take advantage of the vacuum in the center to take votes and seats. "
You can simplify it the general feeling towards the former magistrate by a world that is certainly not far away, but he wants to use instead represent .


Alberto Spatola

0 comments:

Post a Comment