In recent months we have seen a schizophrenic series of international meetings Agenda extremely versatile: you are no longer discussed the navel of the world's largest, but the global issues that are upsetting all countries.
This was probably the result of the new guide to the White House who finished with politics, forgive the directness, the Bush imperialist to go to the coveted multipolarity, which, however, the proof of facts is Arrach between nations that are not found In this futuristic new global order.
The U.S. is following a climax of involvement of other countries, the G2 meeting in Copenhagen, while the world young people in the first place, are following an "anticlimax Glocal": more and more initiatives, the changes start from the "local" to disrupt the engine through the Internet, the entire whole.
When the U.S. delegation went to Beijing, the media all over the world welcomed as if they had regained a new security, the G2 that was looming and that many hoped to be the new leader of the planet. Now this
tandem planetary losing pieces and becomes two cyclists battle it out between the curves of the mountains of the third millennium.
The two major human rights have failed, often hides friction less palatable excuse, in this case, the dilemma of the powerful who are wondering if it is more useful to a democracy (USA) or a dictatorship "efficient" (China).
China and the United States, have fallen into network of the Internet: the virtual corporations, Google, Yahoo, Skype (all made in the U.S.) are confronted on how to deal with the almond-shaped node from users since the People's Republic wants to control his people, but the web this paternalism is not used. The Titanic in
(s) against between Beijing and Washington is developing a crisis even the religious sphere. Consider the humble Dailalama which is found to be the subject of a dispute that seems purely political, but it is religious (though the difference is slight): what to do with religion in the new millennium? Catholics try to ecumenizzarsi to the sound of Opus Dei, the Protestant churches in creating the best franchise McDonald, Sunnis are trying to launch the product (stillborn) of the Kamikaze, the Shiites are trying to create the atomic Persian Jews, discovered the pleasure of not only always be oppressed, got excited about Gaza. In this context, are part of the charming Eastern religions that are already winning the West and weakest in the future will adapt to the minds of the white man undergoing the same transformation of the cult of Isis 2000 years ago.
What have we learned from G2?
We learned that the anticlimax that it needs the planet is made of participatory democracy and the place where the rights have grown day by day and not left to parliaments and prime minister, we should use the web as a tool for the reality and not for cyberwar between giants, we should find an inner spirituality and a healthy atheism that sweep away unnecessary, even harmful religious caste. Aquila
with G8, by Italy in the management agenda the meeting was very productive and well beyond the show little avail.
A lesson can still come from the G8 Abruzzo: people have become addicted and can not stand shows in the style of monarchical premier international. It has gotten to the point of considering how to make demagogic proposals "G" through video and Italy has not and probably never had an international role would be an asset to strengthen the European Union instead of being a whisker of each directive de l'EU
The path of Obama's foreign politician met then the G20 in the U.S., read by opinion leaders of all sides as the best confirmation of the authority of the U.S. president, was in reality a defeat Box containing well. In the face of economic crisis all'incalzante great land have not been able to do anything more than willing to declare defeat tax havens.
The climax of the governments would take more and more consumers, more and more hogs on this planet, but with a touch of ethnicity in more because we fight tax havens, the anticlimax statement should instead be based on "less", reset all the economic theories and propose a new system of progress (social, human, etc ...) that focuses on the person and the environment.
few months ago in Denmark, the battlefield environment, it has consumed the clash between the climax and anticlimax that so far we have proposed: one is that governments could not hide their impotence in the face of global warming, the other thousands of environmentalists seeking to change the course of the planet (I do not know if following the anticlimax exhibited here) probably (each of those environmentalists) to chase a dream but that may be single or joint failure.
One security you can afford to have and, to paraphrase the title of a song by Ska-P, "the empire will fall" we'll see what it will be born from the rubble.
This was probably the result of the new guide to the White House who finished with politics, forgive the directness, the Bush imperialist to go to the coveted multipolarity, which, however, the proof of facts is Arrach between nations that are not found In this futuristic new global order.
The U.S. is following a climax of involvement of other countries, the G2 meeting in Copenhagen, while the world young people in the first place, are following an "anticlimax Glocal": more and more initiatives, the changes start from the "local" to disrupt the engine through the Internet, the entire whole.
When the U.S. delegation went to Beijing, the media all over the world welcomed as if they had regained a new security, the G2 that was looming and that many hoped to be the new leader of the planet. Now this
tandem planetary losing pieces and becomes two cyclists battle it out between the curves of the mountains of the third millennium.
The two major human rights have failed, often hides friction less palatable excuse, in this case, the dilemma of the powerful who are wondering if it is more useful to a democracy (USA) or a dictatorship "efficient" (China).
China and the United States, have fallen into network of the Internet: the virtual corporations, Google, Yahoo, Skype (all made in the U.S.) are confronted on how to deal with the almond-shaped node from users since the People's Republic wants to control his people, but the web this paternalism is not used. The Titanic in
(s) against between Beijing and Washington is developing a crisis even the religious sphere. Consider the humble Dailalama which is found to be the subject of a dispute that seems purely political, but it is religious (though the difference is slight): what to do with religion in the new millennium? Catholics try to ecumenizzarsi to the sound of Opus Dei, the Protestant churches in creating the best franchise McDonald, Sunnis are trying to launch the product (stillborn) of the Kamikaze, the Shiites are trying to create the atomic Persian Jews, discovered the pleasure of not only always be oppressed, got excited about Gaza. In this context, are part of the charming Eastern religions that are already winning the West and weakest in the future will adapt to the minds of the white man undergoing the same transformation of the cult of Isis 2000 years ago.
What have we learned from G2?
We learned that the anticlimax that it needs the planet is made of participatory democracy and the place where the rights have grown day by day and not left to parliaments and prime minister, we should use the web as a tool for the reality and not for cyberwar between giants, we should find an inner spirituality and a healthy atheism that sweep away unnecessary, even harmful religious caste. Aquila
with G8, by Italy in the management agenda the meeting was very productive and well beyond the show little avail.
A lesson can still come from the G8 Abruzzo: people have become addicted and can not stand shows in the style of monarchical premier international. It has gotten to the point of considering how to make demagogic proposals "G" through video and Italy has not and probably never had an international role would be an asset to strengthen the European Union instead of being a whisker of each directive de l'EU
The path of Obama's foreign politician met then the G20 in the U.S., read by opinion leaders of all sides as the best confirmation of the authority of the U.S. president, was in reality a defeat Box containing well. In the face of economic crisis all'incalzante great land have not been able to do anything more than willing to declare defeat tax havens.
The climax of the governments would take more and more consumers, more and more hogs on this planet, but with a touch of ethnicity in more because we fight tax havens, the anticlimax statement should instead be based on "less", reset all the economic theories and propose a new system of progress (social, human, etc ...) that focuses on the person and the environment.
few months ago in Denmark, the battlefield environment, it has consumed the clash between the climax and anticlimax that so far we have proposed: one is that governments could not hide their impotence in the face of global warming, the other thousands of environmentalists seeking to change the course of the planet (I do not know if following the anticlimax exhibited here) probably (each of those environmentalists) to chase a dream but that may be single or joint failure.
One security you can afford to have and, to paraphrase the title of a song by Ska-P, "the empire will fall" we'll see what it will be born from the rubble.
Alberto Spatola
0 comments:
Post a Comment